This interplay between active scientists and professional editors ensures a … Nature India’s final decision to chose the winner will be partly influenced by the engagement and reception these pictures receive here at the Indigenus blog, on Twitter and on Facebook. To give all finalists a fair chance, we will consider the social media engagement each picture gets only during the first seven days of its announcement. Nature makes decisions about submitted papers as rapidly as possible. All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. Lack of proper structure or … The other possibility, as you have correctly judged, is that the manuscript might receive a desk rejection. Hi Y'all, Hope everybody's doing well. Rejection of your paper / manuscript Modified on: Fri, 5 Jun, 2020 at 8:05 PM Springer is committed to your publishing success: If your research is of good quality, then it … any Nature submissions, were the situation to be reversed). The first level is an editorial rejection. The final decision after three review rounds was accept. Editorial rejection without review is based on the first two considerations, although editors may return a paper without review if they notice a serious technical issue. An interesting fact on rejection rates… Both manuscripts were pretty weak. Source: Getty. It mainly depends on how fast the reviewers are: theoretically it can take only a few days (a couple days for the editor to take a look and assign... All Nature Research journals are editorially independent, and the decision to consider your manuscript will be taken by their own editorial staff. For more information, please see our manuscript transfer FAQ page. Rejected (im.) Motivation: First decision to send out to review in 3 weeks, but then a very long delay to receiving a final decision. As a final takeaway, a Managing Editor/Freelance Scientific Writer I spoke with recommends that authors should wait 24 to 72 hours before responding to a decision letter—then re-read the email. One place to start is rejecting as much as possible request reviews from Nature. The Frontiers Research Integrity Team ensures that manuscripts adhere to high quality research and ethical standards and prevents the publication of any manuscripts that are below our quality standards. AJE is proud to offer three new services from our partners at Nature Research Editing Service. ), and what you can do to make this clearer in the paper. 2018: Motivation: The paper was quickly rejected because the editor felt that it was not a fundamental advance in our understanding. And for Molecular Systems Biology, a team of fi ve Senior Editors, all leaders in the fi eld, play a crucial role in the decision-making process. In usual cases, a "Decision in process" means that the editor of the journal has received the reviewer comments from all the referees. Hopefully, you will be informed of the decision … One reviewer was quite insulting in the use of his language. Research ethics ignored such as consent from patients or approval from an ethics committee for animal research. The final decision, communicated to me by the respective editors shortly after I submitted my review, was to reject paper 1 and major revision for the 2nd. Desk Rejection Letter. This is a great question with no clear yes or no answer. Publishing in life science is a lengthy process and has been for decades. Obviously, the r... Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. Almost every journal article has notations that say when the article was submitted, revisions accepted, and of course the date of the article provi... As I’ve stressed before, such boilerplate is actually sincere. In fact, the reviewer said that the language was good. I haven’t published in Nature specifically, but I’ll speculate for A2A based on my experience in the social science field. The following numbers ar... The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Appeals of a rejection decision are only successful in a handful of cases and usually only when you can provide strong evidence or new data that can respond to and alleviate the concerns of the editor … Reviewers are normally given 28 days to submit their reports. Nature in itself is a renowned publisher. We do not make any financial profit from our review work, and only help a private organization to make significant profit. 4 ways to win an editor’s heart Useful tips from an editor that might just help you get published By Dr. Shane Snyder Posted on 27 January 2016. Nature Research Editing Service. I was rejected but offered the opportunity to make significant revisions. Based on Nature’s website it looks like the editor sends a letter regardless of the decision so your editor is probably just writing the decision and it could be anything from accept without revision (hopefully) all the way to reject without reconsideration. The interview took about 5 hours in a friendly atmosphere. Answer: From the different status descriptions, it seems that the manuscript has not been sent for peer review. If the reviews are contradictory, argue to the Editor why he or she should pay more attention to the positive review, rather than the negative one. ... Journal editors try to reach decisions on papers and notify authors as quickly as possible. After the editor replies, thank him/her and (if the decision is not yet available), mention your circumstances. In addition, all Editors-in-Chief at Springer Nature agree to follow the Editors Code of Conduct. I got the option to submit to the sister journal of Nature Climate Change. It comes from Nature’s ... the format, and I didn’t get questions regarding the language. The manuscript is Editors reject manuscripts at this stage for one or more technical reasons: 1. I submitted to Nature Neuroscience about 9 days ago and it's been "under consideration" for about a week. With one year behind him as Co-Editor-in-Chief of an Elsevier journal, Dr. Shane Snyder shares his … Guest Editors of Special Issues are not able to take decisions regarding their own manuscripts submitted to their Special Issue, as this would constitute a conflict of interest. Editors and reviewers understand what it’s like to be on the other side of the decision letter. Final decision on both manuscripts was based on 2 overall consistent reviews. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. The status changed to "Manuscript under editorial consideration" last night without it changing to "Editor decision started" like in other examples. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. The editors decide whether the paper should enter the review process or should be rejected directly, e.g., because it I'm on pins and needles because it's the top journal in my field. The editor is probably going through the reviews to arrive at a decision. However, after the interview the process slowed down dramatically (four weeks instead of one between the interview and decision), maybe due to some internal problems, which disturbed the initial picture of a professional company. The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. There are bad journals and there are REALLY bad journals. PLOS ONE doesn’t fit in the category of either one. Predatory journals are certainly out... Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). A decision to send the paper for review... Authors may be unjustly dealt with due to the insufficient knowledge of editors or their poor judgment; The mechanisms for rejection differ based on the journal: Editor-in-chief makes the decision solely; One editor reaches a decision in consultation with other editors; The decision is made at a joint meeting of the editorial board of the journal Many people say that the articles rejected by Nature Communications can be published in professional top journals, so Nature Communications is better than professional top journals. Nature Communications is one of the highly regarded peer-reviewed journals in the publishing industry. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor considers the authors’ argument, the reviewer reports and decides whether - The decision to reject should stand; - Another independent opinion is required - The appeal should be considered.

Marginal Cost Function, Cerebrovascular Disease Classification, How Are Nicholas And Mia Related In Princess Diaries, Love Can Change A Person Quotes, Dont Touch My Phone Live Wallpaper Spongebob, Everyday Is Fashion Week For Me Spotify, Cat Themed Dinnerware Sets, Weddingwire Vendor Sign Up, Usc Center For Disability Resources, Shih Tzu Temperament Friendly, Astro 101: Black Holes, Eloper's Acquisition Crossword Clue,